Skip navigation

I’m a huge fan of NPR’s First Listen, an online resource at which full albums spanning a wide variety of musical genres are available to stream in their entirety before the commercial release. The quality is what one might expect from streaming, but at least NPR are very good at streaming. I’ve mentioned First Listen in the past, though I more often forget to mention things I’m listening to more casually.

Currently featured on First Listen is yet another recording of Tchaikovsky’s iconic ballet “The Nutcracker”. However, the praise for this recording is high, and it features Sir Simon Rattle and the Berliner Philharmoniker, whom I have been fortunate enough to see live in Symphony Hall, home to our beloved Boston Symphony Orchestra (BSO). I haven’t listened to this recording yet but am hoping to soon. It’s not posted when it will expire, but it’s usually around the time of the CD release, which is 25 Oct 2010.

Another interesting looking recording featured is Bob Dylan’s The Whitmark Demos 1962-1964, for which select songs are available through Oct 19.

Stepping foot inside Jordan Hall is always a treat. Its modest exterior gives no indication of the delight within, and immediately one feels somewhat nostalgic, until it hits you that the features of the stage are strikingly similar to those in Symphony Hall just up Huntington Ave. Jordan Hall is the primary performance space of the New England Conservatory (NEC), and their theatre is beautiful. From my second row balcony seat, I sat sloped toward the stage and tried to recline with the lean. In all honesty, I’m always just happy to be there for the Boston Symphony Chamber Players concerts, which only perform about four times a year on Sunday afternoons. Each concert represents a one-time program, and this afternoon’s featured Bohuslav Martinu’s Four Madrigals, the world premiere of André Previn’s Octet for Eleven, Daris Milhaud’s La Cheminée du Roi René, and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart’s Piano Quartet in G minor. It was admittedly my first time hearing all four pieces.

This excellent program began with principal violist Steven Ansell’s announcement that Mr Previn had injured his hand in an epic battle with a door and that he would not play in the piano quartet as scheduled. Most of us in the audience it seemed were unable to catch the name of the replacement pianist, though I believe he is affiliated with NEC. Naturally, we wish Mr Previn a speedy and full recovery.

The Martinu featured oboist John Ferrillo, clarinetist William R Hudgins, and bassoonist Richard Svoboda in a trio that is strikingly different from those involving strings that I am more accustomed to. To my ears, the voices are clearly distinct but share enough commonality in timbre to be slightly transparent at times. I love the tone of the oboe and bassoon, and the clarinet provides the higher range. The Lento was particularly beautiful with the wind ensemble, though I enjoyed the entire piece.

Previn’s Octet for Eleven, written this year, had an interesting arrangement of the eleven players on the stage. Seated in their natural positions were the strings, with BSO Concertmaster Malcolm Lowe and BSO second violin principal Haldan Martinson on the audience left, and BSO cello principal Jules Eskin (one of my favorites to watch) and BSO viola principal Mr Ansell seated on the audience right. Behind the deeper strings sat BSO principal bassist Edwin Barker. In an arcing row behind them sat BSO principal flutist Elizabeth Rowe followed by Mr Hudgins, Mr Ferrillo, Mr Svoboda, and BSO principal French horn player James Sommerville and finally BSO principal trumpet Thomas Rolfs. Whew.

This piece is arranged into three movements, whose fairly straightforward names really do not leave anything to interpretation: for instance, the first movement is entitled, “♩ = 92″, signifying that each quarter note occurs at 92 beats per minute. No “Allegro moderato” is found here — clearly a composer who knows what he wants! The piece itself was unassuming, fairly straightforward through the first two movements but seemed to grow in complexity by the final movement. It was easy to hear the give and take from the winds and brass to the strings, creating a nice conversation. As always, I enjoyed Ms Rowe’s brief but memorable solo playing. I often do not know what to expect from modern compositions, but I did enjoy this one. Mr Previn was on hand tonight despite the injury and was greeted to a standing ovation for the successful premiere.

After the intermission, we heard a very pleasant piece, Milhaud’s La Cheminée du Roi René (The Fireplace of King René). This seven song wind quintet featured Ms Rowe and Mr Ferrillo, Hudgins, Svoboda, and Sommerville. It reminded me of period music such as that which one might hear at a Medieval or Renaissance festival but with modern wind instruments. I half expected to see a person skipping across the stage while playing the recorder, but for better or worse, it didn’t happen.

Finally, with apologies to our unknown pianist, the Mozart Quartet in G minor for piano and strings (K. 478) was performed by Mr Lowe, Ansell, and Eskin. I believe that Mozart is very difficult to play properly, perhaps more so than other composers. While Mozart is often serious music, it is also often times playful and carefree. This piece manages to capture the moods of both, with dark and dramatic starts and finishes but lighter throughout. Perhaps it is my narrow interpretation of Mozart, but I believe that, especially with the lighter side of Mozart, the bowing technique and attack matters enormously in effective performances. By and large, this chamber group succeeded in that heady task, with special compliments to our currently nameless pianist: the piano seems to be an instrument on which it is particularly difficult to execute properly staccato notes while maintaining the proper amount of air or space in its wake, and the pianist did marvelously in this regard.

I love small ensemble concerts at Jordan Hall for its acoustics and intimacy. Ensemble performers can never really blend into the surroundings of the orchestra and thus have to be nearly flawless in their execution, and the reliable Chamber Players certainly don’t disappoint.

Tonight’s Boston Symphony Orchestra (BSO) concert with James Levine featured music by John Harbison and Gustav Mahler. AB and I were sitting in Orchestra, Row Z, just slightly audience left of center. They were great seats in a less crowded Thursday evening performance. I was very excited about Mahler’s Symphony No. 5 coming in, having had a just a taste of it previously, and I was trying to be hopeful about Harbison’s Symphony No. 3, which was written in 1990. My only other experience with Harbison was another BSO performance in which the two composers were paired in the same program. That Harbison was a Double Concerto for violin and cello, one that I enjoyed greatly. However I must admit that this one was more difficult for me to appreciate. While it began in a very interesting, decidedly modern but still palatable way, it quickly descended into a piece that I could not follow fluidly. At times I struggled with the apparently clashing dissonance, and at one point a shrill tone permeated whatever melody was being attempted in the foreground. I do not think I understood the piece even slightly and unfortunately do not think I was able to appreciate it.

On the other hand, my expectation for Mahler was heightened after having a great experience in two concerts in the first subscription series performance for this BSO season that featured Mahler’s Symphony No. 2. Despite having heard some Mahler, I am not very familiar with his music, except that it’s fairly lengthy and quite dramatic. But that’s what I look forward to, especially in symphonic music from a group like the BSO who can capture a full range of emotions so seemingly effortlessly. The Fifth did not disappoint in this regard. It begins with a big Funeral March, fully employing the horns in several tense passages. While the second movement is similar in this regard, it almost feels like resolution is achieved near the end, transitioning into a brighter Scherzo third movement. At some point I noticed a woodwind (perhaps an oboe or clarinet) that subtly picked up where the cellos had left off, creating a pureness of a tone out of a slightly richer sound. I imagine that many such wonderful nuances are to be found throughout Mahler.

The real gem of Symphony No. 5 is the Adagietto. Its execution tonight was exquisite and emotionally stirring — almost ballet-like in its development. The piece ended with a traditional flourish and fanfare in the final movement, but I will always remember this symphony for its beautiful slow movement.

I have generally had positive experiences listening to Mahler symphonies. I don’t feel like I fully “get” them, and I don’t think they’re thematically as memorable as some of the other symphonists. I’m very glad that I have heard this one, however, and it’s allowed me to be even more receptive to listening more carefully to future Mahler.

For about the entire summer, I’ve been eagerly awaiting these concerts, the first subscription series performance of the Boston Symphony Orchestra (BSO) led during a triumphant return by James Levine. While the BSO did have, by all accounts, a successful opening night performance of Wagner, I had tickets to Fenway Park to see the Red Sox and the Yankees and somewhat begrudgingly made a choice. So for me Thursday and Saturday were my opening nights, the first and third performances of the series for Gustav Mahler’s Symphony No. 2 in C minor, the “Resurrection.” It was particularly special for me to be present on Thursday for my friend CBT’s first trip to Symphony Hall, one of my favorite places in Boston. JP went with me on Saturday.

My impressions of Mahler is that he’s very outspoken; his pieces seem on the long side, and the second symphony is not the exception. While it’s essentially broken up into the traditionally symphonic four movements, one gets the distinct feeling that Mahler has squeezed a couple of additional movements into this piece, with an especially rich finale. This piece is intense and solemn in parts, which no doubt is fueled by the piece’s ominous moniker. There are the mixed emotions associated with the Resurrection event in Christianity: while there is certainly a joy in the celebration of the fulfillment of the ultimate unlikely promise, there is a passionate respect for the struggle that preceded this. Both Mahler and the BSO have managed to capture this in the music.

One thing that struck me particularly about the Tanglewood Festival Chorus and soloists tonight was how they interacted with each other and the instruments. On some occasions, it was difficult to discern whether or not the entire chorus was singing, so subtle and united were their voices. Additionally, non-vocal instruments would enter on occasion in unison with the singers, creating a unique harmony that added a weight to their voices. For their parts, mezzo-soprano Karen Cargill and soprano Layla Claire performed wonderfully. Where typically I favor the lower registers of the mezzo, I found myself equally appreciative of the soprano for this piece.

There are a few albums going on right now at NPR’s First Listen that are worth mentioning, even if briefly. The first is Hilary Hahn’s impending album, on which she recorded Jennifer Higdon’s excellent new violin concerto, coupled with a new recording of Tchaikovsky’s violin concerto (one of my absolute favorites). The jury is out for me on her interpretation of Tchaikovsky, since my very first impressions take some tempos a bit more liberally that I prefer, but her execution is impeccable, of course.

Another album that will be quickly released comes from the ever-soulful John Legend and The Roots. The album, entitled Wake Up, takes old soul tracks and gives them a bit of a modern spin. I’ve always loved John Legend’s voice while mostly loathing the songs he chooses to record, save room for a couple. The Roots are similar in this regard for me: I’ve wanted to like them for a long time, since Phrenology and a live album of theirs, but I’ve found them to be a bit hard to listen to. But when you take both of these artists together, with the excellent choice of material, you get Wake Up, which is wonderful collaboration, exactly what I want from these artists, and ultimately an important album.

Finally, I’m listening to Aloe Blacc, an artist whom I don’t know, on his new album Good Things. I’ve just queued this up, but this right here is what I like. It reminds me immediately of a modern Bill Withers. That can’t be a bad thing.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.